New Relic Research Uncovers Gaps Between Software Leaders and Laggards
Over a third of “More Perfect Software Leaders” report 10+% increased revenue over the last three years; 77% of developer time spent on innovation rather than fixing issues
New Relic, Inc., the industry’s largest and most comprehensive cloud-based observability platform built to help customers create more perfect software, announced findings from its More Perfect Software Research, uncovering behaviors of global software “leaders” and “laggards” and revealing the imperatives for building better software.
Organizations and individuals can visit New Relic’s benchmark tool and tune into its webinar to learn more about what it means to be a software leader or laggard.
Recommended AI News: SecurityHQ, Formerly Known As Si Consult, Reveals New Brand Identity
“New Relic is dedicated to helping our customers become software leaders. In today’s landscape, it is imperative that organizations play offense with software by accelerating in the cloud, practicing observability, being data driven, developing for resilience, and supporting a DevOps culture,” said Lew Cirne, CEO and founder, New Relic.
Who are the More Perfect Software Leaders?
The report found that a small cohort of firms, the “leaders,” 25% of survey respondents, have made far greater progress than their peers in developing more perfect software; whereas the “laggards” are the 25% of respondents that scored lowest.
- 90% of leaders say that developing and deploying more perfect software is a strategic priority.
- Leaders showed stronger revenue growth over the past three years, with more than a third of leaders reporting a 10+% increase in revenue during this time period.
- Leaders were more likely to say that their firm is ahead of the competition in 1) brand perception, 2) employee engagement, 3) financial performance, and 4) pace of innovation.
The report measures how global respondents measure up in five imperatives for software excellence, with the following key takeaways:
Migrating systems to and developing applications in the cloud is vital for producing, deploying, and managing software at a rapid pace.
- On average, leaders run 66% of their software and systems in the cloud, while for the laggards it is only 46%.
- 96% of leaders report adopting a cloud native approach to software development vs. only 24% of laggards.
- 98% of leaders have adopted continuous integration/delivery vs. only 40 % of laggards.
- The top barriers to greater cloud adoption for the leaders were reported as being security concerns and regulations; whereas for the laggards it was lack of skills and sunk investment in on-premises infrastructure.
Observability is a critical component of software development and performance optimization, because it allows developers to rapidly innovate, test, and deploy new features and applications with the confidence that it won’t break other parts of the system.
- 94% of leaders say that making software observable is a key tenet of their software development—not just something bolted on afterward, where only 56% of the laggards say the same.
- 78% of leaders find out about system and software interruptions via observability platforms, compared with only 12% of laggards.
- Leaders are less likely than laggards to report that they learn of software and service interruptions via external customers (33% compared with 48%).
Recommended AI News: FI Consulting Releases Version 2.5 Of ASP With Microsoft Teams Integration
End-to-End Data Visibility
Firms that integrate data on software and systems performance with data on end-user performance can quickly understand how changes to software affect their customers and overall business performance.
- 100% of leader organizations have integrated end-user performance data (across platforms), compared with just 20% of laggard organizations.
- 99% of leaders say they are able to quickly understand the results of changes to software, compared with only 38% of laggards.
Top-performing firms “build for failure.” Primarily, this means employing approaches such as chaos testing and automated remediation to dramatically improve architecture resilience, which gives teams the confidence to make rapid changes in response to changing customer needs.
- Leaders are far more likely than laggards to have adopted chaos testing (77% vs. 30%) and automated remediation (89% vs. with 5%).
- 83% of the leaders have fewer than five major software or systems outages per month, compared with just 3% of laggards.
- 75% of leaders have an average resolution time of less than 30 minutes, compared with only 1% of laggards.
Recommended AI News: Merchants Capital Launches Clik.Ai To Automate Loan Servicing Operations
To produce better software more quickly, firms must give developers the autonomy to make decisions about software development and management. An overly hierarchical team structure and a complex maze of legacy systems can mean that developers spend too much time navigating internal politics and fixing issues, and not enough on innovation and development.
- 99% of leaders said they have in place the observability technology and culture to allow developers to make quick decisions, without fear of repercussions, compared to only 33% of laggards.
- This might be why leaders spend on average 77% of their time innovating (versus fixing issues), while laggards spend just 54%.
Creating More Perfect Software is a Journey
The research finds that firms are only about halfway through their journey to developing and managing outstanding software: the average score is 6.22 out of a possible 10. However, the leaders are significantly further ahead, with an average score of 7.57 compared to laggards’ average score of 4.39.
New Relic’s More Perfect Software research was commissioned in partnership with Longitude, an award-winning thought leadership agency, part of the Financial Times Group. The insights from this research are based on a survey of 400 global IT executives and practitioners conducted in February and March 2020. The respondents are based in Australia, France, Germany, Japan, the U.K., and the U.S. All respondents are employed in organizations with annual revenues of at least $500 million, and 20% of respondents work within the C-suite.